<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citrix Is First To Release Bare Metal Client Hypervisor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 03:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Corrigan</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Corrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>Actually, I want to clarify a couple of things.  First, there are two bare metal client hypervisors that have been shipping for well over a year.  One is from my company, Neocleus, and we shipped our first generation in late 2008.  This was fairly stripped down and was designed to run a secure web browser outside of the OS.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&#039;ve since released 3 generations of the client hypervisor in subsequent solutions.  The latest generation also has a documented API (we call it a VPI) that allows developers to easily create VM-enabled apps that will exploit this new model of running multiple OS instances in the bare metal of a desktop or laptop.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For clarification, MokaFive is a Type 2 hypervisor. It&#039;s a very good product but is not designed to address many of the use-cases that customers are seeking to solve with a Type 1 (bare metal) solution such as NeoSphere.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Check out our website for demonstrations of the technology.  Here&#039;s a link to the Bring Your Own PC demo:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neocleus.com/learn/video-byopcdemoonly.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.neocleus.com/learn/video-byopcdemoon...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I want to clarify a couple of things.  First, there are two bare metal client hypervisors that have been shipping for well over a year.  One is from my company, Neocleus, and we shipped our first generation in late 2008.  This was fairly stripped down and was designed to run a secure web browser outside of the OS.  </p>
<p>We&#39;ve since released 3 generations of the client hypervisor in subsequent solutions.  The latest generation also has a documented API (we call it a VPI) that allows developers to easily create VM-enabled apps that will exploit this new model of running multiple OS instances in the bare metal of a desktop or laptop.</p>
<p>For clarification, MokaFive is a Type 2 hypervisor. It&#39;s a very good product but is not designed to address many of the use-cases that customers are seeking to solve with a Type 1 (bare metal) solution such as NeoSphere.  </p>
<p>Check out our website for demonstrations of the technology.  Here&#39;s a link to the Bring Your Own PC demo:<br /><a href="http://www.neocleus.com/learn/video-byopcdemoonly.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.neocleus.com/learn/video-byopcdemoon" rel="nofollow">http://www.neocleus.com/learn/video-byopcdemoon</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VIRTUMANIA Episode 13: Analyzing Citrix Cloud Synergy &#124; VM /ETC</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4426</link>
		<dc:creator>VIRTUMANIA Episode 13: Analyzing Citrix Cloud Synergy &#124; VM /ETC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 02:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4426</guid>
		<description>[...] Citrix Is First To Release Bare Metal Client Hypervisor (vmetc.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Citrix Is First To Release Bare Metal Client Hypervisor (vmetc.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tom. I obviously missed NxTop over the last few years. I still need to check them out. Interesting how they seem to be below my radar ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom. I obviously missed NxTop over the last few years. I still need to check them out. Interesting how they seem to be below my radar &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Howarth</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Howarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 14:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>Rich,  VirtualComputer were first to market in 2k8 with NxTop and this is a GA product that has just entered v2.0  Citrix&#039;s XenClient is still RC, futher NxTop has a very good management suite around wrapped around it now.   That was the main reason they did not Win at VMworld last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,  VirtualComputer were first to market in 2k8 with NxTop and this is a GA product that has just entered v2.0  Citrix&#39;s XenClient is still RC, futher NxTop has a very good management suite around wrapped around it now.   That was the main reason they did not Win at VMworld last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 20:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>[...] http://vmetc.com       In contrast to their previously expected bare metal client hypervisor, is VMware now focused on enhancing the VMware View Client Local Mode? I’m basing this assumption on the blog post VMware View: Real BYOC and View Client which was published apparently in response to Citrix’s announcement of the XenClient availability earlier this week at the Synergy 2010 conferen.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://vmetc.com" rel="nofollow">http://vmetc.com</a>       In contrast to their previously expected bare metal client hypervisor, is VMware now focused on enhancing the VMware View Client Local Mode? I’m basing this assumption on the blog post VMware View: Real BYOC and View Client which was published apparently in response to Citrix’s announcement of the XenClient availability earlier this week at the Synergy 2010 conferen&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All News &#187; VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4410</link>
		<dc:creator>All News &#187; VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 09:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4410</guid>
		<description>[...] In contrast to their previously expected bare metal client hypervisor, is VMware now focused on enhancing the VMware View Client Local Mode? I’m basing this assumption on the blog post VMware View: Real BYOC and View Client which was published apparently in response to Citrix’s announcement of the XenClient availability earlier this week at the Synergy 2010 conferen.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In contrast to their previously expected bare metal client hypervisor, is VMware now focused on enhancing the VMware View Client Local Mode? I’m basing this assumption on the blog post VMware View: Real BYOC and View Client which was published apparently in response to Citrix’s announcement of the XenClient availability earlier this week at the Synergy 2010 conferen&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode &#124; VM /ETC</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/05/13/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/comment-page-1/#comment-4399</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Answers XenClient Release With View Client Local Mode &#124; VM /ETC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2010/05/12/citrix-is-first-to-release-bare-metal-client-hypervisor/#comment-4399</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments / DISQUS                        Tag Cloud    backup blades citrix design esx esx esxi events free how to hp hyper-v ibm issues linux microsoft news P2V partner patch planning replication SAN server2008 storage twitter ubuntu vcb vdi vi client virtualbox virtualcenter virtualization vmetc vmetc.com vmware vmware converter vmware workstation vmworld vmworld2007 vmworld2008 vmworld2009 vmworld 2009 vSphere windows                    Feedjit.com                 &#171; Citrix Is First To Release Bare Metal Client Hypervisor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments / DISQUS                        Tag Cloud    backup blades citrix design esx esx esxi events free how to hp hyper-v ibm issues linux microsoft news P2V partner patch planning replication SAN server2008 storage twitter ubuntu vcb vdi vi client virtualbox virtualcenter virtualization vmetc vmetc.com vmware vmware converter vmware workstation vmworld vmworld2007 vmworld2008 vmworld2009 vmworld 2009 vSphere windows                    Feedjit.com                 &laquo; Citrix Is First To Release Bare Metal Client Hypervisor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

