<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Challenges Of Virtualized vCenter With A vNetwork Distributed Switch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 08:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware vFabric: A Hypervisor For Networkers? &#8211; Gestalt IT</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4677</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware vFabric: A Hypervisor For Networkers? &#8211; Gestalt IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4677</guid>
		<description>[...] and advanced management features. See this comparison of vSwitch, vSS, vDS, and 1000v as well as Rich Brambley’s vSS/vDS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and advanced management features. See this comparison of vSwitch, vSS, vDS, and 1000v as well as Rich Brambley’s vSS/vDS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware vFabric: A Hypervisor For Networkers? &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4674</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware vFabric: A Hypervisor For Networkers? &#8211; Stephen Foskett, Pack Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4674</guid>
		<description>[...] and advanced management features. See this comparison of vSwitch, vSS, vDS, and 1000v as well as Rich Brambley&#8217;s vSS/vDS [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and advanced management features. See this comparison of vSwitch, vSS, vDS, and 1000v as well as Rich Brambley&#8217;s vSS/vDS [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petya Noname</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4663</link>
		<dc:creator>Petya Noname</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4663</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yeah you are right Cisco Nexus 1000v can&#039;t help if the VSM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich,</p>
<p>Yeah you are right Cisco Nexus 1000v can&#39;t help if the VSM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; vNetwork Distributed Switch challenges</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Talk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; vNetwork Distributed Switch challenges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 12:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4287</guid>
		<description>[...] Rich Bramley of VM/ETC posted on the challenges of distributed switches with virtualized vCenter instances &#8212; largely the problem of a cyclical relationship that could leave you between &#8220;the vDS rock and a hard place,&#8221; as he puts it.   He and I drew the same conclusions and ultimately, I have decided to keep a mix of distributed and standard vSwitches within my environment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rich Bramley of VM/ETC posted on the challenges of distributed switches with virtualized vCenter instances &#8212; largely the problem of a cyclical relationship that could leave you between &#8220;the vDS rock and a hard place,&#8221; as he puts it.   He and I drew the same conclusions and ultimately, I have decided to keep a mix of distributed and standard vSwitches within my environment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks! This will definitely help with the testing and design of our install.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>Thanks! This will definitely help with the testing and design of our install.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>Kevin, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unless I am mistaken on how the Nexus 1000v works, The issue will be with the VMs that will be stranded on the unavailable Cisco vDS. The VSM (as a part of the 1000v switch itself) can&#039;t do anything to help rescue the VMs if the Nexus 1000v is down. The VMs will still need a portgroup on the vSS until the vDS is back up. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A VMware Heartbeat config, in any flavor, will provide redundancy to keep vCenter up and running and therefore keep the vDS available. I just haven&#039;t seen many people buy vCenter Heartbeat yet because of the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, </p>
<p>Unless I am mistaken on how the Nexus 1000v works, The issue will be with the VMs that will be stranded on the unavailable Cisco vDS. The VSM (as a part of the 1000v switch itself) can&#39;t do anything to help rescue the VMs if the Nexus 1000v is down. The VMs will still need a portgroup on the vSS until the vDS is back up. </p>
<p>A VMware Heartbeat config, in any flavor, will provide redundancy to keep vCenter up and running and therefore keep the vDS available. I just haven&#39;t seen many people buy vCenter Heartbeat yet because of the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4226</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4226</guid>
		<description>Hi Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just thinking of further ways to mitigate the above issues:&lt;br&gt;1. Does using a Cisco Nexus 1000v help if the VSM is not on vDS?&lt;br&gt;2. How about using VMHeartBeat between a virtualised vCenter and a physical vCenter?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rich,</p>
<p>Just thinking of further ways to mitigate the above issues:<br />1. Does using a Cisco Nexus 1000v help if the VSM is not on vDS?<br />2. How about using VMHeartBeat between a virtualised vCenter and a physical vCenter?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2010/03/07/design-challenges-of-virtualized-vcenter-with-a-vnetwork-distributed-switch/comment-page-1/#comment-4185</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=5539#comment-4185</guid>
		<description>VTeam,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was a weekend of research and post reading for sure!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for documenting your findings to start with. They definitely&lt;br&gt;helped me understand and form an opinion about a vDS design&lt;br&gt;alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VTeam,</p>
<p>It was a weekend of research and post reading for sure!</p>
<p>Thanks for documenting your findings to start with. They definitely<br />helped me understand and form an opinion about a vDS design<br />alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
