Badges

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

Real Thin Provisioning And Over Allocation – The VI Admin

I’ve already mentioned (and posted) about the vSphere Blog Contest current topic of thin provisioning, but I’ve been thinking about another “product” that has always functioned thin provisioned – The VI administrator. That’s right, I’m talking about the guys and gals that manage all the hypervisor hosts, the server and desktop virtual machines, the networking, and the storage.

Have you thought about the systems to administrator ratios we work under these days? Sure, server consolidation to virtual infrastructure has enabled doing more with less, but is there a better way to explain thin provisioning and over allocation than by looking at the small teams responsible for the virtualized data center? I say not!!

This is my small VM /ETC tribute to the ones who truly are “thin provisioned and over allocated”.

vmetc thin provisioned

Do me a favor, leave a comment letting everyone know how many administrators are on your team and how many VMs you are responsible for. I expect the numbers to be staggering!

Related Posts

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Maish,
    Thanks!

  • bezell

    2 Clusters of 3 ESX hosts, 50 VMs

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    bezell,

    To clarify: 6 ESX hosts and 100 VMs total? Thanks.

  • bezell

    So far 50 total. We SAN-SAN replicate many hosts and use SRM for many.

  • http://www.wjpatton.com/ WPatton

    Rich, that is fantastic and almost unfunny because it is so true! I can't give exact numbers, but we run approx. 100-200 hosts per admin and around 400-600 VMs per admin.

  • mhurley

    1 admin
    88 Hosts
    580 VMs

    • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

      mhurley,

      Thanks!

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Sometimes the best laughs come from reality! Thanks for the numbers.

  • Anonymous

    5 admins total (1 VM/Storage/*ix admin, 2 Windows/physical server admins, 2 Network ops that can do VM/Unix stuff in an emergency)Well this is embarassing… , but I lost count of physical hosts at some point. around 17 VM hosts in local DC. 2 more virtualization hosts at geo-distant locations. About 8 VM hosts at managed customer sites, which aren’t touched or looked at that often (though).5 Virtualization platforms in use (5 VMware Server 1.0, 3 VMware Server 2.5, 2 OpenVZ (Centos 4) hosts, 8 ESXi3 On Dell PE2950s, 4 ESXi 4 , 3 ESX3.5 , 2 Citrix XenServer 5.5); not counting VMware Fusion on other admins’ desktops, running XP VMs, needed for SecureCRT and running the VI/VMware server/Xen clients.No centralized view of the overall environment, but there are approximately 150 VMs.

  • Anonymous

    I’m the only VI Admin, which takes care of:3 Hosts100 VMs4 SANsEntire Org’s NetworkingAnd the Web Programming

    Plus another half dozen or so physical servers.

  • william bishop

    rbrambley, VMsprawl is a huge problem with us…people come to us more frequently, because we no longer have a 2 week lead time (or longer), but rather minutes. The 2 of us that do the VI work spend probably 20% of our week on vmware admin duties alone…the rest of it is our other work (I am the storage admin, vmware admin, server admin, and the team lead (project planning and paperwork mostly). It's not as time consuming as I feared, but we've been overloaded from the beginning. It's far better than physical servers in any case, I replaced my virtual center yesterday, and it was an all day affair, because it was hardware. If it had been virtual it would have been at most a couple hours.

    Sprawl is a huge problem and no one seems to be inclined to rein it in at all.

  • william bishop

    rbrambley, VMsprawl is a huge problem with us…people come to us more frequently, because we no longer have a 2 week lead time (or longer), but rather minutes. The 2 of us that do the VI work spend probably 20% of our week on vmware admin duties alone…the rest of it is our other work (I am the storage admin, vmware admin, server admin, and the team lead (project planning and paperwork mostly). It's not as time consuming as I feared, but we've been overloaded from the beginning. It's far better than physical servers in any case, I replaced my virtual center yesterday, and it was an all day affair, because it was hardware. If it had been virtual it would have been at most a couple hours.

    Sprawl is a huge problem and no one seems to be inclined to rein it in at all.

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Thanks for all the comments so far. I need to sit down with the calculator and come up with the average ratio again!

  • http://www.peetersonline.nl/ Hugo Peeters

    Cool shirt!
    About 30 hosts and 400 vms with 3 admins. Doing everything from design to building vms. PowerCLI to the rescue!

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Thanks Hugo!

    I need to recalculate the avg vm to aim ratio …..

    Sent from my iPod

    Rich Brambley
    http://vmetc.com
    http://www.gestaltit.com

  • Chris

    It was 3 part time virtualization admin for 600-700 QA/Dev VMs and ~150 production VMs across two locations, 4 clusters, and 23 servers.

    After filling a datacenter 3 years earlier than projected the company is going whole hog on virtualization. There are 4 dedicated Virtualization engineers for high level stuff while the existing windows and unix sysadmins will be doing most of the day to day work on systems, like cloning from templates. Anything the sysadmins did on a physical they'll do on a virtual. The plan is to P2V around 2000 existing servers this year and anything new is likely to be a virtual. We'll be busy, but up front we're spending a lot of time deciding which tools to use to manage the environment. Once that's done we should be less busy.

Get My Podcast On iTunes!
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
@rbrambley tweets
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo