<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMware Workstation 7 Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: VMware Easter Egg? Easy Install of ESXi 4 On VMware Player 3.0ter &#124; VM /ETC</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3394</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware Easter Egg? Easy Install of ESXi 4 On VMware Player 3.0ter &#124; VM /ETC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3394</guid>
		<description>[...] it&#8217;s big brother VMware Workstation 7, nowhere is it published that ESX/ESXi 4 is a supported guest OS of VMware Player 3.0. In fact, ESX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it&#8217;s big brother VMware Workstation 7, nowhere is it published that ESX/ESXi 4 is a supported guest OS of VMware Player 3.0. In fact, ESX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dracolith</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dracolith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3807</guid>
		<description>Perhaps...   however, as I understand it,  FT  only  &quot;replays&quot;  if    the   source VM&#039;s host experiences a hardware failure,  it is not useful for IT wanting to troubleshoot an app issue,  doesn&#039;t really record or keep information once the execution has been logged to the protect VM.  If a program running in the protected VM crashes,  FT  dutifully executes the crash,  the app will crash on the protect VM  in lock-step with the crash on the protected VM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;vSphere FT doesn&#039;t let you clone the fault-tolerant VM  to a test environment and  re-play the last few moments leading up to a crash of an important app.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What FT  _does_  do is show that it ought to be possible,  with a certain hardware cost (certainly, such a feature would have substantial overhead like FT).&lt;br&gt;If FT can log to another VM,   it  should be possible to log to a file instead,  if VMware cares to do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ideal example:   production  application crashes, say Apache httpd...&lt;br&gt;Response:  auto-snapshot,  dump recording and a copy of the VM to &#039;investigation&#039; datastore&lt;br&gt;open the clone in VMware Workstation, re-play the moments before the crash  while watching with a debugger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It  may be used to extract  information about the failure that got lost in the automatic reboot of the VM,   or that was never recorded in the first place (poor logging).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps&#8230;   however, as I understand it,  FT  only  &#8220;replays&#8221;  if    the   source VM&#39;s host experiences a hardware failure,  it is not useful for IT wanting to troubleshoot an app issue,  doesn&#39;t really record or keep information once the execution has been logged to the protect VM.  If a program running in the protected VM crashes,  FT  dutifully executes the crash,  the app will crash on the protect VM  in lock-step with the crash on the protected VM.</p>
<p>vSphere FT doesn&#39;t let you clone the fault-tolerant VM  to a test environment and  re-play the last few moments leading up to a crash of an important app.</p>
<p>What FT  _does_  do is show that it ought to be possible,  with a certain hardware cost (certainly, such a feature would have substantial overhead like FT).<br />If FT can log to another VM,   it  should be possible to log to a file instead,  if VMware cares to do it.</p>
<p>Ideal example:   production  application crashes, say Apache httpd&#8230;<br />Response:  auto-snapshot,  dump recording and a copy of the VM to &#39;investigation&#39; datastore<br />open the clone in VMware Workstation, re-play the moments before the crash  while watching with a debugger</p>
<p>It  may be used to extract  information about the failure that got lost in the automatic reboot of the VM,   or that was never recorded in the first place (poor logging).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dracolith</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3387</link>
		<dc:creator>Dracolith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3387</guid>
		<description>Perhaps...   however, as I understand it,  FT  only  &quot;replays&quot;  if    the   source VM&#039;s host experiences a hardware failure,  it is not useful for IT wanting to troubleshoot an app issue,  doesn&#039;t really record or keep information once the execution has been logged to the protect VM.  If a program running in the protected VM crashes,  FT  dutifully executes the crash,  the app will crash on the protect VM  in lock-step with the crash on the protected VM.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;vSphere FT doesn&#039;t let you clone the fault-tolerant VM  to a test environment and  re-play the last few moments leading up to a crash of an important app.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What FT  _does_  do is show that it ought to be possible,  with a certain hardware cost (certainly, such a feature would have substantial overhead like FT).&lt;br&gt;If FT can log to another VM,   it  should be possible to log to a file instead,  if VMware cares to do it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ideal example:   production  application crashes, say Apache httpd...&lt;br&gt;Response:  auto-snapshot,  dump recording and a copy of the VM to &#039;investigation&#039; datastore&lt;br&gt;open the clone in VMware Workstation, re-play the moments before the crash  while watching with a debugger&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It  may be used to extract  information about the failure that got lost in the automatic reboot of the VM,   or that was never recorded in the first place (poor logging).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps&#8230;   however, as I understand it,  FT  only  &#8220;replays&#8221;  if    the   source VM&#39;s host experiences a hardware failure,  it is not useful for IT wanting to troubleshoot an app issue,  doesn&#39;t really record or keep information once the execution has been logged to the protect VM.  If a program running in the protected VM crashes,  FT  dutifully executes the crash,  the app will crash on the protect VM  in lock-step with the crash on the protected VM.</p>
<p>vSphere FT doesn&#39;t let you clone the fault-tolerant VM  to a test environment and  re-play the last few moments leading up to a crash of an important app.</p>
<p>What FT  _does_  do is show that it ought to be possible,  with a certain hardware cost (certainly, such a feature would have substantial overhead like FT).<br />If FT can log to another VM,   it  should be possible to log to a file instead,  if VMware cares to do it.</p>
<p>Ideal example:   production  application crashes, say Apache httpd&#8230;<br />Response:  auto-snapshot,  dump recording and a copy of the VM to &#39;investigation&#39; datastore<br />open the clone in VMware Workstation, re-play the moments before the crash  while watching with a debugger</p>
<p>It  may be used to extract  information about the failure that got lost in the automatic reboot of the VM,   or that was never recorded in the first place (poor logging).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3385</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3385</guid>
		<description>@jasonboche I did not know the FT secondary/shadow VM was actually created via the Record/Replay technology. But, I believe you can&#039;t &quot;rewind&quot; a vSphere VM&#039;s &quot;life&quot; like you can on Workstation - or can you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jasonboche I did not know the FT secondary/shadow VM was actually created via the Record/Replay technology. But, I believe you can&#39;t &#8220;rewind&#8221; a vSphere VM&#39;s &#8220;life&#8221; like you can on Workstation &#8211; or can you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Boche</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3384</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Boche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3384</guid>
		<description>Record/Replay is in vSphere in the FT technology.  It&#039;s leveraged by the FT secondary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Record/Replay is in vSphere in the FT technology.  It&#39;s leveraged by the FT secondary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 04:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by rbrambley: vmetc.com: VMware Workstation 7 Now Available: 




After a few short weeks as a Release Candidate (RC), Version 7 o... http://bit.ly/2xCcDL...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by rbrambley: vmetc.com: VMware Workstation 7 Now Available: </p>
<p>After a few short weeks as a Release Candidate (RC), Version 7 o&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/2xCcDL.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/2xCcDL..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3380</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3380</guid>
		<description>Dracolith,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m not a developer so I&#039;ve never taken advantage of these features of Workstation, but I know no other competing desktop virtualization host can match that integration. VMware has the best offering for development no doubt, and record and replay are incredible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Adding to vSphere, although interesting and useful, probably means extra storage and I/O. Maybe LabManager makes more sense since it is a perfect for a full development environment. I&#039;m not sure, but I don&#039;t think LabManager has record and replay capability today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dracolith,</p>
<p>I&#39;m not a developer so I&#39;ve never taken advantage of these features of Workstation, but I know no other competing desktop virtualization host can match that integration. VMware has the best offering for development no doubt, and record and replay are incredible.</p>
<p>Adding to vSphere, although interesting and useful, probably means extra storage and I/O. Maybe LabManager makes more sense since it is a perfect for a full development environment. I&#39;m not sure, but I don&#39;t think LabManager has record and replay capability today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dracolith</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/26/vmware-workstation-7-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dracolith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4927#comment-3379</guid>
		<description>The  Record and Replay  functions are really special about VMware Workstation  and extremely  cool  ideas,  that really set the product apart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As VMware expands these debugging gems more..   I  can&#039;t  imagine many C++ programmers wanting  to do debugging work without Workstation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I just wish VMware would  get  the  record/replay in  vSphere  as well,  and make it suitable for live servers (not FT)..     Imagine  the hypervisor having   continuous recording on a recently unstable  or particularly critical VM  have a hook  in VMware to   automatically  dump  the past  5 minutes of server execution   to a  logging store,   if an  admin-specified condition is met  [e.g.  security compromise is detected,  a critical service crashes, etc..],  so..  detailed info    is  kept  to assist  thorough offline investigation/debugging of the issue  :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releasenotes_ws7.html#wsfeatures&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releaseno...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a person who dual-boots between Windows and Linux, I also really like the notion of Cross-Platform License Keys,  and some of the other added features like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;Pause a Virtual Machine - Free your CPU resources instantaneously without powering off or suspending the virtual machine.&lt;br&gt;Expand Virtual Disks — Increase the size of the virtual disk from within VMware Workstation. For Windows Vista and Windows 7 guests, the disk partitions can be adjusted without the use of additional software.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  Record and Replay  functions are really special about VMware Workstation  and extremely  cool  ideas,  that really set the product apart.</p>
<p>As VMware expands these debugging gems more..   I  can&#39;t  imagine many C++ programmers wanting  to do debugging work without Workstation.</p>
<p>I just wish VMware would  get  the  record/replay in  vSphere  as well,  and make it suitable for live servers (not FT)..     Imagine  the hypervisor having   continuous recording on a recently unstable  or particularly critical VM  have a hook  in VMware to   automatically  dump  the past  5 minutes of server execution   to a  logging store,   if an  admin-specified condition is met  [e.g.  security compromise is detected,  a critical service crashes, etc..],  so..  detailed info    is  kept  to assist  thorough offline investigation/debugging of the issue  <img src='http://vmetc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releasenotes_ws7.html#wsfeatures" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releaseno.." rel="nofollow">http://www.vmware.com/support/ws7/doc/releaseno..</a>.<br />As a person who dual-boots between Windows and Linux, I also really like the notion of Cross-Platform License Keys,  and some of the other added features like.</p>
<p>&#8220;Pause a Virtual Machine &#8211; Free your CPU resources instantaneously without powering off or suspending the virtual machine.<br />Expand Virtual Disks — Increase the size of the virtual disk from within VMware Workstation. For Windows Vista and Windows 7 guests, the disk partitions can be adjusted without the use of additional software.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
