<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using vSphere Client on Ubuntu Linux with Single Application RDP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancrof</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-2/#comment-5903</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancrof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2011 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-5903</guid>
		<description>not work </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanderlaars</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-5858</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanderlaars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-5858</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vSphere Web Access: Entwicklung eingestellt</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-4638</link>
		<dc:creator>vSphere Web Access: Entwicklung eingestellt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 12:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-4638</guid>
		<description>[...] geben wird, oder ob das eine Windows-only Angelegenheit bleibt, bei der Unix-basierte Admins auf die RDP-Trickkiste ausweichen. Der Akzeptanz bei Betriebssystem-Grabenk&#228;mpfern w&#252;rde ein [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] geben wird, oder ob das eine Windows-only Angelegenheit bleibt, bei der Unix-basierte Admins auf die RDP-Trickkiste ausweichen. Der Akzeptanz bei Betriebssystem-Grabenk&#228;mpfern w&#252;rde ein [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VMware ESX or ESXi? &#171; Harbinger&#39;s Hollow</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-4368</link>
		<dc:creator>VMware ESX or ESXi? &#171; Harbinger&#39;s Hollow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 14:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-4368</guid>
		<description>[...] Use vSphere Client through the vCenter Server instead&#8230; much better. If your excuse is that vSphere Client is only for Windows check this out: Using vSphere Client on Ubuntu Linux with Single Application RDP. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Use vSphere Client through the vCenter Server instead&#8230; much better. If your excuse is that vSphere Client is only for Windows check this out: Using vSphere Client on Ubuntu Linux with Single Application RDP. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-3732</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-3732</guid>
		<description>Brian,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s good enough proof for me, but if you invstigate further let me know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Playing &quot;devil&#039;s advocate&quot; for further comparison:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>That&#39;s good enough proof for me, but if you invstigate further let me know.</p>
<p>Playing &#8220;devil&#39;s advocate&#8221; for further comparison:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>Brian,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That&#039;s good enough proof for me, but if you invstigate further let me know.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Playing &quot;devil&#039;s advocate&quot; for further comparison:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>That&#39;s good enough proof for me, but if you invstigate further let me know.</p>
<p>Playing &#8220;devil&#39;s advocate&#8221; for further comparison:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vCenter Client on Linux &#8211; Single App RDP and You!</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>vCenter Client on Linux &#8211; Single App RDP and You!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-3371</guid>
		<description>[...] Single App RDP using the Ubuntu Terminal Server Client. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Single App RDP using the Ubuntu Terminal Server Client. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/10/23/using-vsphere-client-on-ubuntu-linux-with-single-application-rdp/comment-page-1/#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4889#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>Rich,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Very quickly comparing the three options is interesting:&lt;br&gt;1.) RDP session with a full desktop and VpxClient has seven processes running&lt;br&gt;2.) seamlessrdp session with VpxClient has five processes running&lt;br&gt;3.) RDP session with the single program (VpxClient) has three processes running&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The three processes in #3 above are also present in #2 and #1.  The RDP session with a program (#3) is the base, if you will.  The other options simply add more overhead on top of these same three processes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The full RDP session has the most overhead, as it supports a desktop (explorer.exe) and anything running in the system tray - this included an antivirus process in my tests.  The RDP with a program option you presented definitely requires the least amount of overhead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My tests weren&#039;t very thorough or extensive, but I suspect that delving deeper into this with my handy sysinternals detective kit would most likely only further prove the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>Very quickly comparing the three options is interesting:<br />1.) RDP session with a full desktop and VpxClient has seven processes running<br />2.) seamlessrdp session with VpxClient has five processes running<br />3.) RDP session with the single program (VpxClient) has three processes running</p>
<p>The three processes in #3 above are also present in #2 and #1.  The RDP session with a program (#3) is the base, if you will.  The other options simply add more overhead on top of these same three processes.</p>
<p>The full RDP session has the most overhead, as it supports a desktop (explorer.exe) and anything running in the system tray &#8211; this included an antivirus process in my tests.  The RDP with a program option you presented definitely requires the least amount of overhead.</p>
<p>My tests weren&#39;t very thorough or extensive, but I suspect that delving deeper into this with my handy sysinternals detective kit would most likely only further prove the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

