<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use vCenter Media to Install Standalone SQL 2005 Express and SQL Native Client</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/comment-page-1/#comment-3721</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4647#comment-3721</guid>
		<description>Vladan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Different tables and fields and unrelated data would be my guess. Plus&lt;br&gt;the mobility/felxibility  to put VUM on a standalone server for&lt;br&gt;complex, multi ip subnet, or heavy security environments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The VUM dbase is primarily for the patch repository and status of&lt;br&gt;patches and updates, I guess? Never really looked at the tables that&lt;br&gt;close ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladan,</p>
<p>Different tables and fields and unrelated data would be my guess. Plus<br />the mobility/felxibility  to put VUM on a standalone server for<br />complex, multi ip subnet, or heavy security environments.</p>
<p>The VUM dbase is primarily for the patch repository and status of<br />patches and updates, I guess? Never really looked at the tables that<br />close &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladan</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/comment-page-1/#comment-3720</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 22:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4647#comment-3720</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good how-to Rich... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder why is better to separate the SQL database for VUM and vCenter... Keep the updates apart of vCenter.. ?&lt;br&gt;And also what do you mean by &quot;back end database of a virtualized vCenter&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s good how-to Rich&#8230; </p>
<p>I wonder why is better to separate the SQL database for VUM and vCenter&#8230; Keep the updates apart of vCenter.. ?<br />And also what do you mean by &#8220;back end database of a virtualized vCenter&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/comment-page-1/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4647#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>Vladan,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Different tables and fields and unrelated data would be my guess. Plus&lt;br&gt;the mobility/felxibility  to put VUM on a standalone server for&lt;br&gt;complex, multi ip subnet, or heavy security environments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The VUM dbase is primarily for the patch repository and status of&lt;br&gt;patches and updates, I guess? Never really looked at the tables that&lt;br&gt;close ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vladan,</p>
<p>Different tables and fields and unrelated data would be my guess. Plus<br />the mobility/felxibility  to put VUM on a standalone server for<br />complex, multi ip subnet, or heavy security environments.</p>
<p>The VUM dbase is primarily for the patch repository and status of<br />patches and updates, I guess? Never really looked at the tables that<br />close &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladan</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2009/09/17/use-vcenter-media-to-install-standalone-sql-2005-express-and-sql-native-client/comment-page-1/#comment-3200</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=4647#comment-3200</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good how-to Rich... &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder why is better to separate the SQL database for VUM and vCenter... Keep the updates apart of vCenter.. ?&lt;br&gt;And also what do you mean by &quot;back end database of a virtualized vCenter&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s good how-to Rich&#8230; </p>
<p>I wonder why is better to separate the SQL database for VUM and vCenter&#8230; Keep the updates apart of vCenter.. ?<br />And also what do you mean by &#8220;back end database of a virtualized vCenter&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
