vsphere_static_160x300
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
Badges

vexpert_logo_100x57

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

Things That Make you Go Hmmmm – VMware Requests Veeam Discontinue Support for Free ESXi in Veeam Backup?

In the official press release today Veeam Software Offers New Essentials Bundle, Acceleration Kits for VMware vSphere 4 Veeam mentions a new policy removing support for the use of Veeam Backup with the free version of ESXi.

“At the same time, Veeam introduced a new policy with respect to support for the free edition of VMware ESXi. “As a longtime Premier Technology Alliance Partner and supporter of VMware’s product strategy, Veeam Software takes great pride in creating innovative software products that enhance the customer value of VMware ESX, ESXi, and ESXi Free,” said Ratmir Timashev, Veeam president and CEO. “One such example is support for the free edition of VMware ESXi in Veeam Backup and Replication.

“Recently, VMware requested that Veeam discontinue support for ESXi Free in Veeam Backup and Replication in order to comply with VMware’s updated licensing policy,” Timashev continued. “In light of VMware’s request, and our close technical partnership, Veeam Backup and Replication will no longer support ESXi Free. We will still continue to offer support for ESXi Free to existing Veeam customers who purchased Backup & Replication prior to version 3.1.””

Be sure to read those two paragraphs again.

Veeam, a company that seems to have found a successful niche marketing to SMBs and remote branch office VMware deployments, has been asked to remove support of the use of one it’s popular products with free ESXi. Possibly shedding some additional light on this mystery, the press announcement mentions respect for VMware’s product strategy and Veeam’s long time status as a technology partner. There is no mention of Veeam pulling free ESXi support of the popular FastSCP file management tool.

Without any inside information about the VMware ESXi roadmap and strategy, here is a quick review of ESXi’s public timeline:

  • VMware announces ESX3i and the availability of ordering hardware with ESXi embedded. ESXi appears to be poised to become a ubiquitous hypervisor in datacenters
  • VMware declares ESX classic and the Service Console will be phased out due to security, patching, and distribution size, and the firmware appliance -like ESXi will become the only hypervisor version offered from VMware.
  • VMware announces ESXi Update 2 is free to compete with emerging hypervisor competition. The free version appears to be geared towards small deployments or an introduction to VMware’s licensed versions, and is locked down preventing remote access
  • ESXi Update 3 is mistakenly released with remote administration left open via the RCLI. VMware recognizes the mistake and closes back down remote administration with ESXi Update 4
  • VMware introduces the concept of VIMA/vMA appliances for technology partners to develop remote console based replacements for current Service Console agents used in ecosystem products (VM backup, etc)
  • Veeam publicly removes support for Veeam Backup with free ESXi at VMware’s request.

The above order is relatively chronological, but not necessarily in the exact order.

A shift in Strategy For ESXi?

At a time when most of the virtualization community expects VMware to bend to the free offerings available from the hypervisor competition by offering more features in free ESXi (VMotion, HA, or even remote adminstration), VMware appears to be doing the opposite while asking (forcing?) a technology partner to abandon existing/potential business. On that note, how many VMware ecosystem partners have announced new versions that work in a remote console, VIMA/vMA configuration even with a licensed version of ESXi? None come to mind for me.

Does VMware favor the mass adoption of ESXi any longer or, is this the tip of the iceburg of a power play to sqeeze out competition alternatives to VMware vSphere’s new features? (VMware VCB, vDR and SRM versus Veeam Backup, for example) Keith Ward may have been a prophet with his post Cutting Off the Competition’s Air Supply?

“VMware CEO is Paul Maritz. Paul Maritz is the former No. 3 at Microsoft, and a key player in the late-90s U.S. Department of Justice anti-trust trial. It was Maritz who allegedly made the famous threat about “cutting off Netscape’s air supply.” It’s important to note that Maritz has denied saying it (an Intel executive during the trial said he heard Maritz make that statement during a meeting), but it played a key role in the case.”

Adding to the VMware competition conspiracy theory is last week’s VMworld exhibitors and sponsors contract changes PR nightmare.

[updated 06.06.09] - SearchServerVirtualization’s Alex Barrett provides VMware’s reasons for the request to Veeam. My thoughts and summary here.

Other reactions to Veeam’s announcement so far


[updated 06.05.09
]

Is VMware becoming the bully Microsoft is known for? – by Gabe

Is VMware becoming the bad guy? – by Erik Scholten

Keeping Sales a Priority — at The Expense of Free Tools – by Rick Vanover

Comments on the Veeameup.com post Veeam and Free ESXi – it’s official now

Follow Twitter replies to Veeam’s announcement on Tweetgrid : http://tweetgrid.com/grid?l=0&q1=veeam

Related Posts

  • No comment ;-)
  • Dracolith
    Seems like thoroughly anti-competitive behavior on VMware's part. The sort of thing one would expect from MS (if European regulators weren't watching them so closely).
    Which is fairly disconcerting, and may provide a catalyst for more people to further develop other complete hypervisors+management stacks that may eventually be able to compete against VMware.

    Veeam has a backup product with a competitive advantage over VMware's product (works with the free Hypervisor). So VMware forces them to remove that support.

    A "Request" of that nature is not a request. You can basically derive an implied threat, that there may/will be unspecified nasty consequences (whatever they can think of doing later) if the request is refused, the monopolist frames the demand as a request to save face.

    However, if Veeam had refused to honor the request, one can imagine VMware cutting off their relationship, and Veeam's access to technical information, VMware people, etc, their ability to code for the hypervisor.

    Future versions of VMware's hypervisor might contain measures to block Veeam.

    Or in the extreme case, they might withdraw the free ESXi hypervisor altogether, and blame one vendor.. or.. tell the community the reason was some sort of abuse (e.g. third parties duplicating VMware features)
  • What might have seemed like unfair anti competitive behavior from VMware is shown in a new light now. Be sure to read my latest post on the topic http://vmetc.com/2009/06/05/things-that-make-yo...
  • I heard about this issue well it is quite alarming in a certain way, well they can do whatever they want with their business.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Hyper9 Cowabunga
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

@rbrambley tweets
Advertisements
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo