Badges

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

Things That Make You Go Hmmmm – VMware Bans Competitors from VMworld 2009?

[updated 052809 - VMware will allow competition to present and exhibit at VMworld 2009. See VM /ETC post Things That Make You Go Hmmmm - VMware Sets Record Straight On Competition At VMworld]

It’s been a while since I’ve been inspired to add to my “Things that make you go Hmmmm” series, but Brian Madden’s post about VMware’s change in the VMworld 2009 Sponsor and Exhibitor agreement has temporarily rekindled my motivation. In summary, Brian points out that the new agreement verbiage states that products deemed by VMware that overlap or substitute with/for VMware’s products will not be allowed in sessions or on the exhibition floor. I could not find the referenced agreement on the VMworld 2009 Sponsors and Exhibitors page.

Read Brian’s post:
For shame! VMware is now banning competing vendors’ products from VMworld! – Brian Madden – BrianMadden.com

He has some strong opinions on the matter:

“What kind of crazy world is VMware living in? Do they think that by denying that competition exists, more people will be tricked into buying their stuff?

And what’s this mean for VMworld? No Microsoft. No Citrix. No Neocleus or Virtual Computer. No InstallFree or Xenocode. No Symantec or Quest. VMworld 2009 will just be a big rah rah hug-fest.”

Personally, I can understand VMware’s decision, but it still sits funny with me. VMworld’s popularity and draw was no doubt based on the open door policy for all virtualization vendors making it a virtualization community wide event. Obviously, market competition has influenced the business decision to allow this to continue. This will be a PR nightmare if handled wrong. I’m sure the competition is loading their marketing cannons with this new ammo as quick as possible.

updated 052809 - Scott Lowe offers his opinions and projections on the topic with his post VMware, This is Wrong:

“What are you going to do, VMware? Let’s see, you’re expanding into the territory formerly handled by many of your ISVs, and now you’re blocking access to competing products at VMworld.”

updated 052809 - Marc Farley offers an understanding view of VMware’s decision with his post The end of free love at VMworld? Ok

Looking for a silver lining, this decision could have a positive effect on


conference logistics and crowd control and satisfaction. VMworld attendance has soared in numbers each year, and it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to assume that attendance could reach 20,000 in 2009 or 2010. Can the Moscone Center in San Francisco handle those size crowds? IMO, Moscone couldn’t handle the 10 to 12 K attendees in 2007 very well. Limiting vendor participation is one way to reduce the number of people at the conference. Let’s face it, reducing the number of attendees results in a greater experience for the conference goers, but this is just one, outside rationalization.

Related Posts

  • Dracolith

    I think VMware may be shooting themselves in the foot with this strategy, in the long run.
    One of the major reasons to choose VMware over the competition is the ecosystem that has developed around their product.

    But VMware keeps expanding the capabilities around their product, for example… VMware Data Recovery provides backup capabilities for VMs… As a result, third-party products like Veeam Backup, esXpress, begin to overlap with VMware's offering, because VMware is expanding so eventually their core product will overlap with almost all the third-party enhancements…

    I anticipate this would have an effect on those third-party vendors, who have and do provide a lot of value for VMware, in providing VMware users many choices.

    But going forward… developers of new “complimentary” products would clearly be much more prone to take a multi-hypervisor point of view. The market for your product may be more secure and sustainable if you target Hyper-V or XenServer than VMware.

    If you just target VMware, they may add your product's capabilities to a new “enhanced-super-enterprise-++” edition of the next major version of ESX, if enough customers like it.

    VMware can lose third-party product mindshare, the third-party companies that provide ample third-party tools for VMware can do a lot of work to support other hypervisors instead, with more faith that their vendor won't try to replace their product and lock them out.

  • http://conrey.org/ Theron Conrey

    There was a big “pat ourselves on the back” attitude since 2006 that was boasted that VMworld was THE virtualization conference. Everyone would be here,showcased, etc etc. Doing this damages VMware's credibility, as well as goes back on their implied promise that VMworld would be THE virtualization conference.

    I can only hope they've got some solid reasoning they make public soon, cause it strongly gives the impression of, “well now that you guys are actually big enough to play with me, I don't want you here anymore”

    -Theron

    (oh and add an openid option so I can post as me without having to use discus please and thank you)

  • http://www.brajkovic.info/ Ilija

    Maybe they are afraid of those vendors, and their products, that's why they did this.

  • Mark Miller

    It really seems like VMware is scared of the competition. I mean, Microsoft is kind of coming on strong with their next release.

  • Dracolith

    I think VMware may be shooting themselves in the foot with this strategy, in the long run.
    One of the major reasons to choose VMware over the competition is the ecosystem that has developed around their product.

    But VMware keeps expanding the capabilities around their product, for example… VMware Data Recovery provides backup capabilities for VMs… As a result, third-party products like Veeam Backup, esXpress, begin to overlap with VMware's offering, because VMware is expanding so eventually their core product will overlap with almost all the third-party enhancements…

    I anticipate this would have an effect on those third-party vendors, who have and do provide a lot of value for VMware, in providing VMware users many choices.

    But going forward… developers of new “complimentary” products would clearly be much more prone to take a multi-hypervisor point of view. The market for your product may be more secure and sustainable if you target Hyper-V or XenServer than VMware.

    If you just target VMware, they may add your product's capabilities to a new “enhanced-super-enterprise-++” edition of the next major version of ESX, if enough customers like it.

    VMware can lose third-party product mindshare, the third-party companies that provide ample third-party tools for VMware can do a lot of work to support other hypervisors instead, with more faith that their vendor won't try to replace their product and lock them out.

  • http://conrey.org/ Theron Conrey

    There was a big “pat ourselves on the back” attitude since 2006 that was boasted that VMworld was THE virtualization conference. Everyone would be here,showcased, etc etc. Doing this damages VMware's credibility, as well as goes back on their implied promise that VMworld would be THE virtualization conference.

    I can only hope they've got some solid reasoning they make public soon, cause it strongly gives the impression of, “well now that you guys are actually big enough to play with me, I don't want you here anymore”

    -Theron

    (oh and add an openid option so I can post as me without having to use discus please and thank you)

  • http://www.brajkovic.info/ Ilija

    Maybe they are afraid of those vendors, and their products, that's why they did this.

  • Mark Miller

    It really seems like VMware is scared of the competition. I mean, Microsoft is kind of coming on strong with their next release.

  • Pingback: Things That Make You Say Hmmmm - VMware Sets Record Straight On Competition At VMworld | VM /ETC

Get My Podcast On iTunes!
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
@rbrambley tweets
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo