Badges

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

What If Microsoft Virtualization Editions Existed?

cropcircleswirlThe fact that Microsoft has embraced virtualization is an understatement. The fact that Microsoft has been slow to embrace other virtualization vendor’s capabilities to run Windows operating systems as guests is equally an understatement, but what if this wasn’t the case? That is, what if Microsoft abandoned the licensing strategy of anchoring Windows to physical hardware? What if the folks at Redmond recognized virtual hardware and virtual machines (VMs) as equals to physical devices when assigning licenses? Taking it a step forward, what if specialized versions of the various Windows operating systems and applications were specifically developed for VMs along with special licensing? Maybe it will never happen, but there have been a few signs recently that give one hope for the possibility.

Like crop circles, the following are some posts that caused me to wonder “what if?”.

First, there was a rumor about a virtualized version of Microsoft Office.
latoga labs – Rumor: Microsoft Office Virtualization Edition

“I heard an interesting rumor this week that Microsoft is planning on updating their licensing model in the near future for Microsoft Office to introduce a virtualization version. The way it was described to me is that if you want to migrate your physical desktops to virtual desktops and run Microsoft Office on them, you will need to purchase a special Office Virtualized Edition.”

Interesting no doubt, but the more I think about this rumor it really starts to sound like a reason to justify making companies pay for another Office license – as if the first Office license can’t P2V with the OS? I have not heard anything else since about “Virtualized Office”.

Next there was the  announcement that Microsoft has identified a market opportunity for a low cost version of Server 2008 designed to run on low-end servers. To fulfill this need, Microsoft released Server 2008 Foundation, which comes pre-installed on hardware when purchased through original equipment manufacturers (OEMs). Paul Thurrott’s post Windows Server 2008 Foundation Preview explains Microsoft’s vision for this version:

“Microsoft saw a glaring hole in its product line, one that was not filled by the consumer-focused Windows Home Server or the overly-functional SBS. This year, it’s possible to purchase perfectly capable low-end servers for well under $1000. So it doesn’t make sense that Microsoft’s lowest cost infrastructure server, Windows Server 2008 Standard, costs $500. Clearly what the company needed was something that offered core Server features but came in well under that price.”

Which makes me wonder if Microsoft would ever create a similar edition for virtual instances of server 2008?

Finally, the biggest news about a virtual edition of a Windows operating system was XP Mode in the upcoming Windows 7.

Again a post from Paul Thurrott along with Rafael Rivera - Secret No More: Revealing Windows XP Mode for Windows 7

“XP Mode consists of the Virtual PC-based virtual environment and a fully licensed copy of Windows XP with Service Pack 3 (SP3). It will be made available, for free, to users of Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate editions via a download from the Microsoft web site. (That is, it will not be included in the box with Windows 7, but is considered an out-of-band update, like Windows Live Essentials.) XPM works much like today’s Virtual PC products, but with one important exception: As with the enterprise-based MED-V (Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization) product, XPM does not require you to run the virtual environment as a separate Windows desktop. Instead, as you install applications inside the virtual XP environment, they are published to the host (Windows 7) OS as well. (With shortcuts placed in the Start Menu.) That way, users can run Windows XP-based applications (like IE 6) alongside Windows 7 applications under a single desktop.”

My understanding of XP Mode is that it is a specialized VM edition of Windows XP.

What If?

Would it not be nice if a “Windows Server v12n Edition” existed? How about Windows Desktop V12N? Stripped of the extra drivers and applications. Licensed per virtual machine. Free to migrate between virtual hosts. Allow the hot add and remove of virtual RAM and CPU. Operating systems tweaked to be easily cloned for dynamic demand. Applications written so that they could be duplicated as needed with services that could self load balance. Able to leap tall buildings …

Is my head in the clouds, and, for that matter, are these crop circles just a hoax?

Related Posts

  • Gavin Haslett

    Problem with this is that it breaks a fundamental licensing “loophole” that many large companies leverage; the one where you can legally license a single copy of Datacenter for the physical machine, and then said physical machine can happily host as many Enterprise and Standard servers as your hardware can handle. This is because the Datacenter license allows it.

    If Microsoft did as you suggest, they would almost certainly “plug” that hole in the Datacenter licensing, and then each virtual instance would increase in cost to the company. This would actually lead to fewer servers being virtual, and as a result it's quite likely that Microsoft would make LESS money than they do with the current licensing method. It's in Microsoft's best interest not to do this because if suddenly companies are paying per instance instead of per physical host, then it drives at least a portion of that “traffic” to free alternatives.

    As it stands, we use primarily Windows servers in our environment precisely because we can stand up an instance, delete it, upgrade it and pretty much do whatever we like with it once we've licensed the host that it stands on. It also makes buying a host easy as all we do is add Windows Datacenter as a line-item when we cut the PO.

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Gavin,

    Your points are valid, and I admit I realize there might be a cost barrier for Microsoft to do this. I chose to look past these points for the sake of the concept. It will definitely take some serious cost analysis to determine if it could be done.

    As a argument to your Datacenter edition licensing, wouldn't a per virtual machine model take us full circle back to volume licensing as before for physical servers? Everybody is fine with that right?

    Also, you are aware that Microsoft virtual licensing does not allow you to freely move your VMs between virtual hosts? Unless it's changed recently, Microsoft only allows you to “transfer” a VM once very 90 days. I covered this last year: http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-appli

  • Dracolith

    Assign a datacenter license to each physical server.
    From: http://vmetc.com/2009/01/21/january-2009-update


    For Windows Server software, except in a few cases (see “Assignment of Licenses” above), licenses may only be reassigned to new hardware after 90 days. This, however, does not restrict the dynamic movement of virtual OSEs between licensed servers. As long as the servers are licensed and do not simultaneously run more instances than the number for which they are licensed, you are free to use VMotion and System Center Virtual Machine Manager to move virtualized instances between licensed servers at will.

  • http://vmetc.com rbrambley

    Dracolith,

    Thanks. I guess I forgot completely about that update … even though I reported on it! :(

  • http://www.storrs.ca Andrew Storrs

    Just to clarify for other readers of this post who might be misled.

    The following: “where you can legally license a single copy of Datacenter for the physical machine…”

    Should really read: “where you can legally license a copy of Datacenter for EACH PHYSICAL CPU SOCKET IN the physical machine…”

    Didn't want anyone to think one license of Datacenter would cover you on a 2 or 4 socket server.

  • Larry Passo

    From the MS point of view, if you perform a P2V conversion of a desktop you might not be able to legally use the copy of MS Office that was on the desktop. If the desktop came with a pre-installed OEM version, that Office installation can only be used with the original hardware. In this case, you wouldn't legally be able to use that OS version either. Now, if you built a desktop with VL OS and Office licensed media, it should be usable as a VM after a P2V.

  • knail1

    Have a very basic questions guys… how does windows enforce the Datacenter licensing? I could theoretically go and install the same license on many different physical servers and nobody would notice, correct?

    -O

  • knail1

    Have a very basic questions guys… how does windows enforce the Datacenter licensing? I could theoretically go and install the same license on many different physical servers and nobody would notice, correct?

    -O

  • Pingback: Partnership Of Microsoft And Citrix Intensify VDI Spotlight | VM /ETC

Get My Podcast On iTunes!
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
@rbrambley tweets
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo