vsphere_static_160x300
Badges

vexpert_logo_100x57

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

New VMware Calculator Compares Aquisition Cost of VMware VI3 vs Hyper-V with SCVMM

VMware has announced a new online calculator that specifically compares the total cost of implementing VI 3.X and Microsoft Hyper-V. An online tool similar to Microsoft’s competitive calculator introduced last year, the VMware Virtualization Cost-Per-Application Calculator is designed to emphasize that the cost of implementing virtual infrastructure is more than the expense of licenses. In the past many have criticized the cost of VMware’s flagship suite of VI 3.X Enterprise products as too expensive, and with both Citrix and Microsoft now claiming to offer free hypervisors, VMware’s new calculator helps illustrate the message that VM density at equal performance matters to the cost analysis bottom line.

“Following the lead of analysts and customers, VMware has adopted “cost per application” as a more accurate metric to compare costs between virtualization solutions. Going beyond a simplistic license price comparison, evaluating cost per application takes into consideration the number of virtual machines that can be run on a single server, or the ”virtual machine density” enabled by a specific virtualization solution. The higher the virtual machine density enabled, the higher the server consolidation ratio. The higher the consolidation ratio, the more an organization can reduce its infrastructure costs (including costs for servers, networking. storage, power and datacenter space), and software costs, (including guest operating system and virtualization software licenses). Following this logic, the solution that can provide the higher consolidation of servers – without an impact to performance – also provides the most value to customers.”

I decided to test the calculator with a 50 VM / application example.

Note: I have not verified prices used in the VMware calculator, nor have I deeply analyzed the methodology.I would recommend companies considering virtualization use the results of the calculator as a starting point and adjust accordingly with real figures provided by the representatives and partners of both Microsoft and VMware.

VMware’s calculator requires answering six questions, and the result is a detailed report based primarily on the following formula:

Hardware Cost
(virtualization hosts, management servers, networking, storage)
+
Power and Cooling Cost
+
Datacenter Real Estate Cost
+
Guess Operating System Software Cost
+
Virtualization Software Cost
+
Virtualization Management Software Cost
=
Total Cost of Deployment
/(Divided by)
Number of Application Virtualized
=
Cost per Application

Screen shot of the 6 inputs:

After submitting, a 10 page report (after .pdf conversion) was generated. The Executive Summary section sums up the results:

Based on your inputs, the cost-per-application to virtualize 50 applications using VMware Infrastructure 3 Enterprise Edition is $3,105 — 20% lower than with Microsoft Windows Server 2008 (Hyper-V) and System Center.

The report provides much more detail, but here is a summary table of the total costs:

VMware Results

For more details about the methodology and assumptions of the VMware Cost Per Application Calculator read this white paper.

I would not be surprised if there is a lot of debate between Microsoft and VMware over the methodology and the results.

I hope this this calculator is either expanded in the future or another one is introduced to compare XenServer and VMware VI Enterprise (current and future versions) as well.

Related Posts

  • Dracolith
    This calculator makes some assumptions that might not be warranted. For example: that you're going to buy all new hardware for your virtual infrastructure. That you're going to buy the really high-end equipment from name-brand vendors like Dell, HP that VMware supports.

    There are a lot of inexpensive server hardware options you can buy that aren't supported by VMware ESXi in particular.

    To run your Xen and Hyper-V servers, you can in many cases utilize existing equipment, you can piece to servers using cheap hardware, like IDE controllers,


    Got a bunch of servers with 3ware or Adaptec controllers?
    Depending on the specific controller, with VMware ESXi you may just be out of luck!

    The hardware support of Hyper-V is phenomenal (as I understand, pretty much any controller that will have a Windows driver)

    So is XenServer's; pretty much, if the RAID card is supported out of the box, you can use it with XenServer.

    I have also in several cases been able to take the manufacturer's CentOS driver, and recompile it in a way that it would work with XenServer.

    With ESXi I would be out of luck.

    The cost of totally replacing infrastructure and having to pick the high-end brand-named servers to be safe is a cost unique to ESXi.

    With XenServer, or Hyper-V, one may be able to choose less expensive equipment than VMware would require, and then VMware looks more expensive in infrastructure cost department as well.....
blog comments powered by Disqus
Hyper9 Cowabunga
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
@rbrambley tweets
Advertisements
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo