<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise-class High Availability and Disaster Recovery and Management for VMware ESX Environments #BC2370</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Short Take - VMworld 2008 Edition - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Short Take - VMworld 2008 Edition - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>[...] Rich Brambley has some great coverage of various VMworld sessions: BC3819, BC2370, PO2575, and VD3261, among others. Excellent work, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rich Brambley has some great coverage of various VMworld sessions: BC3819, BC2370, PO2575, and VD3261, among others. Excellent work, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I do not recall any current or future version of ESX discussed as supported or not in this session. In fact, I had no idea ESX 3.5 was not supported. 

I just researched VCS at http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1 and discovered that ESX 3.0 is the only  listed version.

Thanks for pointing this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I do not recall any current or future version of ESX discussed as supported or not in this session. In fact, I had no idea ESX 3.5 was not supported. </p>
<p>I just researched VCS at <a href="http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&#038;pvid=20_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&#038;pvid=20_1</a> and discovered that ESX 3.0 is the only  listed version.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/comment-page-1/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I do not recall any current or future version of ESX discussed as supported or not in this session. In fact, I had no idea ESX 3.5 was not supported. 

I just researched VCS at http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&amp;pvid=20_1 and discovered that ESX 3.0 is the only  listed version.

Thanks for pointing this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I do not recall any current or future version of ESX discussed as supported or not in this session. In fact, I had no idea ESX 3.5 was not supported. </p>
<p>I just researched VCS at <a href="http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&#038;pvid=20_1" rel="nofollow">http://www.symantec.com/en/ca/business/products/agents_options.jsp?pcid=pcat_business_cont&#038;pvid=20_1</a> and discovered that ESX 3.0 is the only  listed version.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lowe</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>Rich, did they indicate if VCS would be compatible with ESX 3.5? Last time I checked, VCS was still only compatible with ESX 3.0.x. Any changes there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, did they indicate if VCS would be compatible with ESX 3.5? Last time I checked, VCS was still only compatible with ESX 3.0.x. Any changes there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Lowe</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/comment-page-1/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/2008/09/19/enterprise-class-high-availability-and-disaster-recovery-and-management-for-vmware-esx-environments-bc2370/#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>Rich, did they indicate if VCS would be compatible with ESX 3.5? Last time I checked, VCS was still only compatible with ESX 3.0.x. Any changes there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, did they indicate if VCS would be compatible with ESX 3.5? Last time I checked, VCS was still only compatible with ESX 3.0.x. Any changes there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

