<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to License Windows VMs in a Non Microsoft Virtual Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: January 2009 Updates to Microsoft Virtualization Licensing Briefs &#124; VM /ETC</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1918</link>
		<dc:creator>January 2009 Updates to Microsoft Virtualization Licensing Briefs &#124; VM /ETC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1918</guid>
		<description>[...] to have Microsoft licensing for the hardware to host Windows guests. I&#8217;ve posted before about how using he Datacenter edition may make the most sense for this scenario. The briefs have specific languague for ESX [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to have Microsoft licensing for the hardware to host Windows guests. I&#8217;ve posted before about how using he Datacenter edition may make the most sense for this scenario. The briefs have specific languague for ESX [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinking sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links, 8/30/2008: Usable space, licensing Windows</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>thinking sysadmin &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Links, 8/30/2008: Usable space, licensing Windows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 03:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>[...] How to License Windows VMs in a Non Microsoft Virtual Environment: Why Windows Server 2008 Datacenter Edition may be the best choice. (Seen at blog.scottlowe.org.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How to License Windows VMs in a Non Microsoft Virtual Environment: Why Windows Server 2008 Datacenter Edition may be the best choice. (Seen at blog.scottlowe.org.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link Scott!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link Scott!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualization Short Take #17 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualization Short Take #17 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>[...] over at VM /ETC gives us a great breakdown on licensing Windows VMs for a non-Microsoft virtualization solution. He comes to the same conclusion some of my customers have already made: licensing Windows Server [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over at VM /ETC gives us a great breakdown on licensing Windows VMs for a non-Microsoft virtualization solution. He comes to the same conclusion some of my customers have already made: licensing Windows Server [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1129</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1129</guid>
		<description>Another point to note is that licensing is done by socket, not by core. So it makes sense, from a liensing perpective, to buy hosts with multiple cores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point to note is that licensing is done by socket, not by core. So it makes sense, from a liensing perpective, to buy hosts with multiple cores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>Jason,

Thanks for confirming the concept of this post with real world prices!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Thanks for confirming the concept of this post with real world prices!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Willey</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Willey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>clicked Post on that one by accident it should have ended : 

One thing I noticed when comparing our corporate pricing to “street” pricing, and selected reseller pricing - is that they tend to all be discounted by the same percentage. So while the numbers may end up different, you will still have a consistent percentage of savings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clicked Post on that one by accident it should have ended : </p>
<p>One thing I noticed when comparing our corporate pricing to “street” pricing, and selected reseller pricing &#8211; is that they tend to all be discounted by the same percentage. So while the numbers may end up different, you will still have a consistent percentage of savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Willey</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/08/26/how-to-license-windows-vms-in-a-non-microsoft-virtual-environment/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Willey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=646#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Great news for high density virtualization environments.. not so great news for old school &quot;scale out&quot; environments.   For my organization it means that we can deliver software savings for the first time as part of our virtualization model.   

I think the day this was announced I heard the collective &quot;DOH!&quot; of every company that deployed their virtualization platform on low density servers.  

One thing I noticed when comparing our corporate pricing to &quot;street&quot; pricing, and selected reseller pricing -  is that they tend to both discounted by the same percentage.  So why the numbers may end up different, you will still have a consistent percentage of savings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news for high density virtualization environments.. not so great news for old school &#8220;scale out&#8221; environments.   For my organization it means that we can deliver software savings for the first time as part of our virtualization model.   </p>
<p>I think the day this was announced I heard the collective &#8220;DOH!&#8221; of every company that deployed their virtualization platform on low density servers.  </p>
<p>One thing I noticed when comparing our corporate pricing to &#8220;street&#8221; pricing, and selected reseller pricing &#8211;  is that they tend to both discounted by the same percentage.  So why the numbers may end up different, you will still have a consistent percentage of savings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
