Comments on: New Microsoft Application Mobility Brief does not cover the Windows Operating System http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/ Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com. Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:50:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: sidaknoy http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-4693 sidaknoy Mon, 25 May 2009 09:44:00 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-4693 -*- -*-

]]> By: sidaknoy http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-2535 sidaknoy Mon, 25 May 2009 08:44:38 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-2535 -*- -*-

]]> By: Windows 7 virtualization licensing change rumored | VM /ETC http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1806 Windows 7 virtualization licensing change rumored | VM /ETC Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:46:36 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-1806 [...] this year, there is already speculation and rumor that perhaps Microsoft will loosen it’s virtualization licensing policies once again. A much needed move for modern virtual infrastructure in my opinion, Microsoft may [...] [...] this year, there is already speculation and rumor that perhaps Microsoft will loosen it’s virtualization licensing policies once again. A much needed move for modern virtual infrastructure in my opinion, Microsoft may [...]

]]> By: How to License Windows VMs in a Non Microsoft Virtual Environment | VM /ETC http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1121 How to License Windows VMs in a Non Microsoft Virtual Environment | VM /ETC Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:12:59 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-1121 [...] New Microsoft Application Mobility Brief does not cover the Windows Operating System [...] [...] New Microsoft Application Mobility Brief does not cover the Windows Operating System [...]

]]> By: Jason Willey http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1089 Jason Willey Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:26:06 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-1089 I'm pretty surprised that Microsoft wouldn't include Windows 2008 in the licensing revision, considering Hyper-V quick migrations would also in theory fall into the 90 day limitation. I’m pretty surprised that Microsoft wouldn’t include Windows 2008 in the licensing revision, considering Hyper-V quick migrations would also in theory fall into the 90 day limitation.

]]> By: Jason Willey http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-5349 Jason Willey Thu, 21 Aug 2008 08:26:00 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-5349 I'm pretty surprised that Microsoft wouldn't include Windows 2008 in the licensing revision, considering Hyper-V quick migrations would also in theory fall into the 90 day limitation. I’m pretty surprised that Microsoft wouldn’t include Windows 2008 in the licensing revision, considering Hyper-V quick migrations would also in theory fall into the 90 day limitation.

]]> By: Rich http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-1086 Rich Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:17:56 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-1086 Scott, It's more appropriate to ask for a hands up for all those using VI 3.X that have a Windows Server Datacenter License (needed for >4 Windows VMs per physical server) for each ESX host in their ESX Clusters. Scott,

It’s more appropriate to ask for a hands up for all those using VI 3.X that have a Windows Server Datacenter License (needed for >4 Windows VMs per physical server) for each ESX host in their ESX Clusters.

]]> By: rbrambley http://vmetc.com/2008/08/19/new-microsoft-application-mobility-brief-does-not-cover-the-windows-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-5348 rbrambley Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:17:00 +0000 http://vmetc.com/?p=643#comment-5348 Scott, It's more appropriate to ask for a hands up for all those using VI 3.X that have a Windows Server Datacenter License (needed for >4 Windows VMs per physical server) for each ESX host in their ESX Clusters. Scott,

It’s more appropriate to ask for a hands up for all those using VI 3.X that have a Windows Server Datacenter License (needed for >4 Windows VMs per physical server) for each ESX host in their ESX Clusters.

]]>