<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding NetApp SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/</link>
	<description>Go Green with Virtualization. Go UGLY Green with vmetc.com.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-5837</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-5837</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NetApp SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure and VIBE &#124; VMware Tips</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>NetApp SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure and VIBE &#124; VMware Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>[...] ref: Yellow-Bricks.com discussion on SMVI ref: VM /ETC discussion on SMVI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ref: Yellow-Bricks.com discussion on SMVI ref: VM /ETC discussion on SMVI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-746</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve used Replication Manager with our Clariions in conjuction with Snapview/SANCopy and Avamar for a POC and we&#039;ve had nothing but problems with this. We have around 930 VMs (mostly Windoz) and while we continue to use Clariions we gave back the SW. Not very good during a 60 POC.

The story sounds good on paper but implementing it is painfull and rather cludgy.

The Avamar stuff is pretty good but we had to have yet more storage for backups. Why couldn&#039;t we use the storage we had?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve used Replication Manager with our Clariions in conjuction with Snapview/SANCopy and Avamar for a POC and we&#8217;ve had nothing but problems with this. We have around 930 VMs (mostly Windoz) and while we continue to use Clariions we gave back the SW. Not very good during a 60 POC.</p>
<p>The story sounds good on paper but implementing it is painfull and rather cludgy.</p>
<p>The Avamar stuff is pretty good but we had to have yet more storage for backups. Why couldn&#8217;t we use the storage we had?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Stevenson</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-5214</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Stevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-5214</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve used Replication Manager with our Clariions in conjuction with Snapview/SANCopy and Avamar for a POC and we&#039;ve had nothing but problems with this. We have around 930 VMs (mostly Windoz) and while we continue to use Clariions we gave back the SW. Not very good during a 60 POC.

The story sounds good on paper but implementing it is painfull and rather cludgy.

The Avamar stuff is pretty good but we had to have yet more storage for backups. Why couldn&#039;t we use the storage we had?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve used Replication Manager with our Clariions in conjuction with Snapview/SANCopy and Avamar for a POC and we&#8217;ve had nothing but problems with this. We have around 930 VMs (mostly Windoz) and while we continue to use Clariions we gave back the SW. Not very good during a 60 POC.</p>
<p>The story sounds good on paper but implementing it is painfull and rather cludgy.</p>
<p>The Avamar stuff is pretty good but we had to have yet more storage for backups. Why couldn&#8217;t we use the storage we had?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-740</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-740</guid>
		<description>Chad,

Thanks for the info on EMC&#039;s solution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info on EMC&#8217;s solution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrambley</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrambley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>Chad,

Thanks for the info on EMC&#039;s solution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad,</p>
<p>Thanks for the info on EMC&#8217;s solution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Sakac</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Sakac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-736</guid>
		<description>FYI - EMC has the same capability for any EMC customer out there - Replication Manager has supported VMware for some time, and now has the ability to integrate and automate datastore or individual machine level restore as of Replication Manager 5.1.2.   In our case - Replication Manager as a single product can automate Exchange, SQL server, Oracle, other Apps, and now VMware, so we don&#039;t call it &quot;Replication Manager for Exchange/SQL Server/VMware&quot; (although perhaps more folks would know if we did)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; EMC has the same capability for any EMC customer out there &#8211; Replication Manager has supported VMware for some time, and now has the ability to integrate and automate datastore or individual machine level restore as of Replication Manager 5.1.2.   In our case &#8211; Replication Manager as a single product can automate Exchange, SQL server, Oracle, other Apps, and now VMware, so we don&#8217;t call it &#8220;Replication Manager for Exchange/SQL Server/VMware&#8221; (although perhaps more folks would know if we did)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Sakac</title>
		<link>http://vmetc.com/2008/06/08/understanding-netapp-snapmanager-for-virtual-infrastructure/comment-page-1/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Sakac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vmetc.com/?p=419#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>FYI - EMC has the same capability for any EMC customer out there - Replication Manager has supported VMware for some time, and now has the ability to integrate and automate datastore or individual machine level restore as of Replication Manager 5.1.2.   In our case - Replication Manager as a single product can automate Exchange, SQL server, Oracle, other Apps, and now VMware, so we don&#039;t call it &quot;Replication Manager for Exchange/SQL Server/VMware&quot; (although perhaps more folks would know if we did)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI &#8211; EMC has the same capability for any EMC customer out there &#8211; Replication Manager has supported VMware for some time, and now has the ability to integrate and automate datastore or individual machine level restore as of Replication Manager 5.1.2.   In our case &#8211; Replication Manager as a single product can automate Exchange, SQL server, Oracle, other Apps, and now VMware, so we don&#8217;t call it &#8220;Replication Manager for Exchange/SQL Server/VMware&#8221; (although perhaps more folks would know if we did)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

