vsphere_static_160x300
Badges

vexpert_logo_100x57

gestaltitbadge

follow-me-twitter

Subscribe to me on FriendFeed

Comments / DISQUS
Feedjit.com

Understanding NetApp SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure

This post is a supporting post to the discussion earlier this week sparked by Scott Lowe’s tip on avoiding ESX snapshots when using SAN device snapshots. NetApp’s SnapManager for Virtual Infrastructure (SMVI) is discussed as a solution for streamlining the coordination of snapshots between ESX and the SAN. Luckily, Nick Triantos from NetApp joined the discussion on Scott’s blog with some “under the hood” information:

“For those who are not familiar with the process SMVI follows here’s how it works:

1) Initiate NetApp snapshot request
2) SMVI call to VC over port 443 – https. VC call to lgtosync.sys driver inside the Guest. Quiesce, flush fs buffers
2) VMsnapshot
3) NetApp Snapshot
4) After NetApp snapshot completion, remove VMsnapshot

The whole process takes somewhere between 5-6 secs. Because it’s so quick, there’s barely any I/Os accumulated in the Redo Log so deleting the VMsnap is a rather quick process.”

So you can see that SMVI covers all the possible causes of snapshot corruption by flushing and quiescing the VM, and then initiating an ESX snapshot before creating a SAN snapshot. SMVI’s single point of management for the whole process is awesome to say the least!

Nick also wrote a SMVI preview on his blog back in March that also has great information and screen shots:

“SVMI has a client based and server based component. The server will be typically installed
on the Virtual Center server, although not required, and the client portion can be installed in your laptop if you’d like or you can install both server/client in the Virtual Center server. SVMI can be driven both by GUI or CLI.”

Related Posts

  • Eric Stevenson
    We've used Replication Manager with our Clariions in conjuction with Snapview/SANCopy and Avamar for a POC and we've had nothing but problems with this. We have around 930 VMs (mostly Windoz) and while we continue to use Clariions we gave back the SW. Not very good during a 60 POC.

    The story sounds good on paper but implementing it is painfull and rather cludgy.

    The Avamar stuff is pretty good but we had to have yet more storage for backups. Why couldn't we use the storage we had?
  • Chad,

    Thanks for the info on EMC's solution!
  • FYI - EMC has the same capability for any EMC customer out there - Replication Manager has supported VMware for some time, and now has the ability to integrate and automate datastore or individual machine level restore as of Replication Manager 5.1.2. In our case - Replication Manager as a single product can automate Exchange, SQL server, Oracle, other Apps, and now VMware, so we don't call it "Replication Manager for Exchange/SQL Server/VMware" (although perhaps more folks would know if we did)
blog comments powered by Disqus
Hyper9 Cowabunga
Support VM /ETC
Support VMETC.com

Support VMETC.com

Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
@rbrambley tweets
Advertisements
VMTN Roundtable Podcasts
Subscribe



Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Add to netvibes
Add to Plusmo